To what extent could it be argued that scientific management is good Essay

To what extent could it be argued that scientific management is good management - Essay Example Scientific management perspective has its origins from the work of Fredrick Winslow Taylor in the late 1880s and early 1890s. The management approach evolved during the industrial revolution when factories recognised the need for automation and mechanisation of some work processes. Some themes of industrial revolution and engineering included the need for rationality, efficiency, work ethic and standardisation of the best practices in order to eliminate waste (Taylor, 2010). Fredrick Taylor is considered the father of scientific management since he sought to introduce the ‘one best practice’ rather than allowing employee discretion in the tasks. Through ‘time and motion studies’, Taylor managed to fix job performance standards through introducing standardised ‘time, quality of work and costs’ associated with each job in the organisation (Taylor, 2010). Frank and Lillian Gilbreth advanced the fatique and motion studies that proved that proper job design and coordination of movements in the workplace reduced to efficiency through minimising time wastage and idle time. Henry Gantt introduced Gantt charts that demonstrated the priority of tasks and stages of production thus enabling employees to prioritise work and adhere with the work schedules. Thesis statement: scientific management is a good management in contemporary business environment since it increases organisational productivity and ensures efficiency in the production methods. Taylor based his scientific management on four principles that entail scientific study of work in order to determine the best efficient method of performing a specific task. Tsutsui (2001) claims that scientific study of work principle aims at replacing the ‘rule of thumb’ or common sense manner of doing jobs with a scientific manner than breaks down the job in to tasks and determines the most efficient method of doing the job in order to maximise efficiency. In this case, scienti fic management aims at enhancing workflow efficiency through redesigning the layout of the work environment in order to reduce time wastage and distractions. The second guiding principle of scientific management is the scientific selecting of workers for each job and training them to efficiently perform the tasks (Guillen, 1994). This principle is aimed at matching employees to their jobs depending of the required skills, capabilities and motivation of each individual worker in order to enhance productivity. The third principle entails monitoring worker performance, provision of job instructions and supervision in order to ensure workers are using the most efficient methods in their jobs (Taylor, 2010). In this case, Taylor advanced the notion that employee motivation is equivalent to incentive theory since employees are motivated by financial rewards. Taylor advocated that improvements in job productivity should be accompanied by equivalent increase in the piece-rate pay in order t o encourage the workers to commit more efforts and maximise their productivity. Lastly, the fourth principle of scientific management aims at dividing the wok between the managers and workers so that managers could concentrate on the application of scientific methods in designing tasks and supervision while workers can concentrate on the execution of their job according to the already established scientific methods

Is There Really a Heaven Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Is There Really a Heaven - Research Paper Example Christians believe that Heaven is the place where God and his angels reside (Bunyan 56). The life in this world is temporary and human beings will be able to continue their eternal life only after leaving this world. Heaven was taken from human beings because of disobedience of Adam and Eve and human beings will be able to be a part of Heaven after they spend a life on this earth by doing good deeds. Bible gives a detailed account of the presence of Heaven and Hell and as per the book, both Heaven and Hell exist and human beings will be placed in both as per their deeds in this world. Overall, it is stated that God keeps the whole right as to decide who is to go to Heaven and who to Hell. The decision depends on His mercy on humankind (Bunyan 68). Therefore, Christianity speaks of existence of Heaven. Like Christian religion, Islam also speaks about the existence of Heaven. There are a number of instances in Quran, where the readers can find mentioning of ‘Jannah’, the A rabic word for Heaven, which is indicative of the fact that Heaven exists as per Islamic religion (Masumian 129). Muslims believe that Heaven will be rewarded to those Muslims who will do good deeds and they will be able to enjoy the bounties of the Garden of Heaven while unbelievers will be thrown in the fire of Hell as a punishment for their ill doings. As per Islamic religion, human beings will be allowed to enter Heaven based on the comparison between good and ill deeds, if good deeds are more, the Muslim will be able to enter Heaven while if bad deeds are more, the Muslim will be sent to Hell. There are detailed physical representations of Heaven in Quran as a happy place, where there will be no sorrows (Masumian 134). Jewish religion gives a little account about Heaven and this information is not as elaborative as in Islam and Christianity. The readers can find the mentioning of an immortal soul that will be able go back to its Creator after leaving this earth (Moody 114). Tor ah, the Jewish book talks about resurrection and immortality but in actuality, there are no straightforward descriptions about the fate of people after vanishing from earth. There is no apparent or comprehensible assistance to the followers as what is the coming destiny as an afterlife (De Lange 85). However, the belief in the afterlife exists as well as in Heaven. Therefore, there is no negation of the concept of Heaven in Judaism as well. So, as per Jewish religion, Heaven exists. Human beings can never be perfect but God being forgiving and gracious allows them to enter Heaven forgiving their wrong deeds to some extent. Kvanvig (2008) says, â€Å"human beings are sinners, and that God justifies such human beings, i.e., grants them heaven in spite of their not deserving it.† A Heaven exists where human beings will be assessed in terms of their performed deeds and God will decide for their destiny in Heaven or Hell. According to Kvanvig (2008), Heaven is a place of reward wh ile Hell is a place for punishment. The existence of Heaven as well as Hell cannot be negated. People if asked about their belief in Heaven give mixed opinions and it can be seen that those who prioritize religion mostly believe in existence of Heaven (Moody 64). However, those having shaking belief in religion or having no belief at all, think that Heaven is an imaginary place, which cannot exist in reality. Even critics have mixed